Computer programming, consultancy and related activities:
Computer Systems & Communication Equipment Software Design
Electronic Chips Programming
Social Media Applications Development & Management
Cyber Security Architecture
Public Networking Services
Cyber Risk Management Services
Auditing, Reviewing and Testing Cyber Risks
Managed Cyber Security Services Provider
Marketing Services Via Social Media
Design Services (interior design, garden design)
Calligraphers & Painters
Service activities related to printing and advertising:
Color Separation Services
Design & Artwork Services
Greeting Cards Production & Distribution Services
Promotional Gifts Preparing
Startup Fee AED 200
Licence AED 650
1 año AED 850 (USD 233)
2 años AED 1508 (USD 411)
3 años AED 2161 (USD 589)
Token Wallet address BTC 19xvUdQoZosrzYKNaTCK834zRkg5Bogop BCH qqqmyqjspnq0fazk9wvv0elc8vxdp2rkvgfqs3s87x LTC LKNvBgwEtE3w7oEUYiSVb96qCe7xFDBvp8 ETH/DAI 0x1cbbcf2ca8849893ad7feac5ef5c735f6d91fa4e XMR 44AXEt8ZkmjgGuUrPaoNTzBGhp92L3HozSYxAip7dz8qL6A3neJBriLRSjC8Qnam4tEhfw2yXzcXsbZ2dJiWHDC7Ji8nBvx
Se encuentran una al lado de la otra. Las dos ofrecen licencias de freelancing en las que uno puede hacer trade a nombre del UBO únicamente. Si uno prefiere hacer trade bajo un seudónimo, es necesario incorporar una compañía. Si tus servicios son IT pero relacionados a algún fin financiero véase DIFC. Existen diferentes tipos de corporaciones disponibles (Freelance, FZLLC, FZE). Cada corporación debe elegir sus actividades en base a una lista de actividades licenciables, las cuales tienen costos unitarios. Algunas Free-zones ofrecen hasta 3 actividades por corporación al mismo costo, ver Ajman Free-zone.
La lista de actividades para freelancers es exhaustiva y bastante detallada, les dejo el link ya que tomaría un post entero para
Actividades disponibles para freelancers: https://gofreelance.ae/freelance-activities.html
Más detalles y costos de incorporación: https://gofreelance.ae/
Costo de incorporación aproximado: 7500 AED anual + 20 AED Knowledge Fee.
Residencia: Si, con costo extra.
Ras al Khaimah ofrece otras alternativas que no están disponibles en el resto del país ya que mediante las Free-zones también se puede incorporar de manera local. Disponibilidad de registro de LLCs (on-shore) y FZLLC (off-shore).
Actividades disponibles: https://rakez.com/Portals/30/Download/Form-Docs/Business-Activity-List/Business-Activity-list-Eng.pdf
Costo de incorporación: Varia según entidad, incorporación básica 6990 AED.
Residencia: Si, a costo dependiendo de entidad seleccionada.
Para los usuarios que son diseñadores o trabajan en actividades relacionadas a la pre y post producción esta Free-zone en Abu Dhabi, análoga a Dubái Media City tiene el mejor paquete por lejos hoy día. Además ofrece un hibrido llamado “Dual Licence” donde la Free-zone sponsorea a la compañía incorporada dentro del Abu Dhabi Economic Department con el fin de que la compañía pueda trabajar on-shore sin necesidad de incorporar otra entidad. Este arreglo es único de twofour54.
Actividades disponibles: https://www.twofour54.com/en/business-setup/business-activities/
Costo de incorporación: Gratis por 2 años.
Residencia: Si al costo.
Token Wallet address BTC 19xvUdQoZosrzYKNaTCK834zRkg5Bogop BCH qqqmyqjspnq0fazk9wvv0elc8vxdp2rkvgfqs3s87x LTC LKNvBgwEtE3w7oEUYiSVb96qCe7xFDBvp8 ETH/DAI 0x1cbbcf2ca8849893ad7feac5ef5c735f6d91fa4e XMR 44AXEt8ZkmjgGuUrPaoNTzBGhp92L3HozSYxAip7dz8qL6A3neJBriLRSjC8Qnam4tEhfw2yXzcXsbZ2dJiWHDC7Ji8nBvx
submitted by AytonNick to u/AytonNick [link] [comments]
The person behind Crypto Police is Paul Cliffe, aka Benj C a fake journalist profile...The Crypto Police appears to be a self appointed group that apparently calls our bad behaviour and freely attacks people they do not like... But who are they really?
Crypto Police is actually someone called - Paul Cliffe, a serial failure and someone who jumped on the Blockchain bandwagon and missed it completely. And yes you know who?
You cannot make this stuff up...
Paul Cliffe is CEO of Block Venture Projects Ltd which is a dissolved company. He claims to be an Investor, have a BVP Digital Asset Fund and work with Family Offices. His profile suggests he fell in love with Bitcoin, but clearly struggled make money from it. As Block Ventures Project Ltd didn't last long.
Paul also masquerades on Linkedin as Benj C a journalist, with a degree in english from Cambridge and he wrote a series of pieces and articles that remain libellous and defamatory This is when I first came across him. I have never actually met Paul or done business with him but he claims to have intimate knowledge of my business affairs, finances and company activities. This is the first time I have bothered to reply in any form.
So what else does he get up too? His profiles across social media say he is CEO of Block Venture Project, worked for EFG Private bank? He is an Investment Advisor, runs a Fund, works with families, and leads compliance for EFG Bank! Well that is interesting.
Apparently Paul is a renowned speaker? An Investment and Financial Adviser who finds it necessary to operate anonymously, under fake names and accounts.. His latest post below as an Investment Adviser 22 Jan 2020...
Block Venture Project Ltd is apparently a Fund?According to Paul Cliffe he runs and manages a Crypto Venture Fund? But clearly you have to have real funds to deploy? A fund also has to be in a regulated jurisdiction. He claims to have investment holdings in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple and BCH but his company filed no accounts, no fund accounts or valuation? So where are these investments held?
Surly someone working in compliance would know to operate a fund you must have a jurisdiction, staffed by people that are regulated as investment professional?
A Digital Asset Venture Capital fund is how Paul describes it? But the company was dissolved a few months after this post, the company remained dormant and filed no accounts?
In a medium article Paul claims to have BVP-5 Fund? But there is no record of this. Where is this fund incorporated? Does Paul Cliffe have a record of running a fund? Which jurisdiction is the fund? Or is this more smoke and mirrors?
An article published 10 December 2019 in BTC Peers shows Paul Cliffe still operating as Block Ventures Project Ltd, 6 months after the company was dissolved???
The article starts Don't fake it!!!
Paul Cliffe still operating as BVP although it is dissolved
Well Benj C, Crypto Police we know who you are?Paul Cliffe's general profile explains he is an Adviser to Family Offices, and on Linkedin that he works in Compliance are indeed worth looking at closer. He worked for private banks, and apparently ran a Digital Asset Fund - BVP-5? Not mentioned?
Ask yourselves, would Family Offices deal with people who have no provenance, have no company, a last four dissolved? Family Office due diligence is extensive, and would he pass?
I know how tough and onerous this is, owning a regulated crypto exchange in Malta and having passed UBO's, numerous checks, and had to hired a full team, Compliance Officer, Money Laundering Risk Officer and sit before the MFSA for the VFAA licence. Setting up a fund is equally difficult and expensive. We also work with several families and sovereign funds and in each domain and jurisdiction one operates, your are required to present everything, included audited sources of wealth, make declarations and provide full disclosures.
Paul claims to work in Compliance, but he hides behind a fake account, uses fake names, claims to operate a fund, still presents himself at Block Venture Project Ltd although dissolved. he clearly has an odd view of what compliance really means.
Paul Cliffe is a close friend is On Yavin, that Paul uses as an attack dog, but at least Yavin although somewhat deluded, has the balls to put his names to things he accuses people of, although just like Paul doesn't present any facts. They scaremonger, make accusations, create the big headlines of Scammer, or Criminal, or Fraudster...but the dog doesn't actually follow through and bite!
Both have narcissistic tendencies, they want to draw attention to themselves. But Paul Cliffe thinks he can operate anonymously, lacking both balls and conviction to account for his accusations of peoples apparent fraudulent activities, skirting over details, offering not actual evidence at all. In efforts to damage the reputation and business activities of others.
Paul Cliffe's last business Block Venture Project Ltd ended is dissolution. It was apparently a successful digital asset fund. Along with his previous 4 companies, all dissolved. So where did the fund money go? Or is this a facade, no substance, it never existed. Are the companies dissolved because they make no money or is there a tax avoidance thing going on? Did Paul Cliffe disclose this activities to his employers, as he had to have a job, as his businesses never made any money? Does his employer know he uses fake accounts? Attacks people with baseless accusations using a fake name? In his compliance role does his employer know he claims to run an investment fund?
Paul Cliffe's latest company dissolved. His 4th.
Block Venture Project Wix website is taken down. The company incorporated Feb 2018 was under mandatory striking off 16th July 2019. I was astonished at the number of shares issued 1 billion? Odd for a start up with no business?
Here are the others dissolved businesses. When you analyse the details since 2011 non of Paul Cliffe's businesses have filed any actual accounts. In fact all business were dissolved, a mandatory strike off. What this means is the business didn't make money, was left dormant and was starting to cost Mr Cliffe money.
Paul Cliffe's business portfolio makes interesting reading.
All dissolved and no accounts filed.
Another dormant company
Funny how those involved in 'smoke and mirrors' deceit stick together...follow similar patterns, accuse others...It's a well know strategy of reflection called 'mirroring' used by sociopaths, to accuse others of the things you are guilty of. You could say I am doing the same, however in this case I am merely replying to accusations made. And yes I had the pleasure of working with two sociopaths i ejected from my life who spend time attacking everything I do. But hey, that's life.
In a similar fashion to Cointelliegence Ltd owned by On Yavin, the various businesses remained dormant for a number of years. Cointelligence trades in the UK, but has no income it seems nor has it filed any accounts. When you search Paul Cliffe on Companies House these are the only businesses that come up, but there are no actual accounts filed? Why is that? How does Mr Cliffe make money and where does he pay his taxes? The same questions I ask of Mr Yavin? Why the secrecy? Why can we not find your accounts, given the rest of us have to comply with UK companies law?
People is glass houses and all that...
Questions remain. In the last decade how has Paul Cliffe made a living? As his fake name Benj C does he make money from being a journalist, or hiding behind Crypto Police. Hiding being the key word here. And what is his real relationship with Mr Yavin?
Facade, veneer, smoke and mirrorsSo we have two people Paul Cliffe and On Yavin who present themselves as successful business people, clean as a whistle, as they take the morale high ground.
But when you poke it, you find it is a facade. Paper-thin veneer of smoke and mirrors. Of dormant companies, the optics of tax avoidance, business that make no money, no filed accounts and no taxes paid . yet they accuse others of far worse.
People are concerned if they speak up they too will be attacked. At CC Forum Max suffered the same threats and had no option but to let things get out of hand which hurt our industry and made us look bad.
Should you trust anything Paul Cliffe or come to that On Yavin write about, say or do?
I say only this.
Ask to see the evidence.
submitted by AytonNick to u/AytonNick [link] [comments]
Opinion Piece: based on publically available information written March 2019.I wrote this article in March 2019 and decided to re-publish it on Reddit.
Cointelligence or should they be called CoinIgnorance?This article asks many questions of Mr Yavin and his company Cointelliegnce.
Mr On Yavin (information below suggests not his real name) is the founder of Cointelligence Ltd a business that has been dormant for 2 years, has no trading history. No accounts filed, but lives, works and trades in the UK freely?
Mr Yavin portrays himself as the saviour, the crypto police and yet on his website you can plainly see from the pictures of the website below, the business accepted money for sponsored advertisements that promote STOs.
Yes that's right security tokens that are deemed financial instruments. Therefore in direct contravention of FCA rules, and other regulatory frameworks laid out by the SEC and ESMA and in doing so has been involved in the financial promotion of financial instruments.
The evidence discussed in this document has been provided by Cointelligence. It shows they accepted payments for financial promotion, and thus equally guilty of market manipulation for commenting on and rating client projects that are issuing financial securities. And should the website change to deflect investigations, the infringement, this article is public record there has been a breach of financial services regulations. It is also likely buyers of these tokens lost money and made decisions based on Cointelligence advice and guidance.
NOTICE. This document shows screen shots of Cointelligence websites taken 28 March 2019 and updated in April. And Companies House documents and reports on Cointelligence Ltd.
Cointelligence will soon be brought to the attention of the SEC, CFTC, FCA and ESMA. Why?
Cointelligence is and has been openly promoting and rating STOs via their website…This equates to manipulation of Financial Markets…
Should anyone including Mr Yavin accept money to promote financial securities when they are neither regulated or authorised, this is against the law.
The Cointelligence website clearly shows they rate projects for money, noted as (“sponsored”) and is thereby knowingly or unknowingly taking part in market manipulation of securities, tokens via the website are promoted to retail buyers.
Their site also allows anyone to access live information relating to a financial security, without necessary controls, disclaimers or buyer warnings. You can also get access projects investment material without revealing who you are? Securities are only for sophisticated and experienced investors, and cannot be sold to retail in this way.
Cointelligence also offer STO ratings handled by anonymous people, yes that is exactly what I thought. There is no view of who these people are, the criteria, independence and whether they are qualified (regulated) to assess anything really, notwithstanding a financial instrument. Information is thus passed on in the assessment that can directly mislead retail buyers of financial instruments.
“Is there considerable evidence emerging to suggest Cointelligence and Mr Yavin are involved in market manipulation, rating financial instruments that influence buyer decisions!”
Who is Cointelligence?
When you dig deeper Cointelligence is a business with no trading history. It remains dormant 2018 and 2019 filed as dormant. The company set up by Mr Yavin to infiltrate the Blockchain community and get involved in ICOs and STOs, like many seeing easy opportunities to make money. The website even encourages anyone to Publish an STO?
Yes that's right, they are encouraging projects to publish their projects that related to a financial instrument called a Security. They even have a box in the top right corner (“Publish ICO/STO”).
It is interesting to watch and read Mr Yavin’s bullish rhetoric against those who he believes flout the law. Mr Yavin freely attacks anyone and everyone he dislikes or maybe he is paid to attack. As this brings him attention and notoriety. However when you piece the facade we find On Yavin is far worse than those he accuses. Cointelligence is drawing in founders of projects into his murky world and by default places their project at risk.
Mr Yavin attacks everyone, at events, on platforms and summits let him. Fearful of themselves being attacked.
Recent Example: Bitbond
Bitbond promotion of their STO
I draw you attention to Cointelligence advertising Bitbond STO’s a few months back.
The mere fact Mr Yavin allows the advertising of a Security (a financial instrument) on his website means he is knowingly flouting capital market regulations. Regulation as a self proclaimed expert he talks about. It also looks like he charges his clients for rating their projects with so called anonymous experts, accepting payments for rating an STOs. One assumes the larger the payment, the better your rating!
Cointelligence apparently has an Academy according to the website, teaching this Blockchain stuff, but clearly they do not understand the rules. when you look at Companies House it is very revealing. Cointelligence Ltd company according to Companies House remained dormant until Nov 2018, and in 2019 accounts remains dormant. But Cointelligence is clearly active and trading. It is a company that pretends to be a Blockchain company, but is their aim to mislead, to deceive and dare I say avoid paying tax.
As shown on the website (28th March 2019) Cointelligence are Rating Securities! We have confirmed with the management teams of the STO projects they paid to be listed = Financial Promotion!
Can it get worse?
Cointelligence in rating securities appears to be taking on and competing with Moody’s and the S&P (Standard & Poors) Rating Agencies. The website freely admits they RATE ICOs and yes Security Tokens (STO’s) that are tradable securities..!
Bang to rights!
Cointelligence are not regulated to promote securitiesCointelligence or Mr Yavin are NOT on FCA register, the company is not registered with the FCA sandbox, the PRA or any regulated body at all. Yet the website confirms they are all involved in direct promotion of securities?
Yes that is right, despite what Mr Yavin says publically — Cointelligence Rates STOs.
Security Tokens are traditional financial instruments (equity, debt, convertibles) that are digitised onto the open ledger. One can argue there is no such thing as a Security Token (STO) market, as the process involves the digitisation of conventional financial instruments. A more efficient, faster and cheaper process that comes under existing Securities Laws.
STOs are a regulated Capital Markets activity for private companies to sell their shares (stores of value). Therefore all STOs are digital versions of securities and come under prevailing Securities Laws including the SEC. I am sure these authorities will be interested to find out what Mr Yavin is offering to US projects and citizens buying securities.
Those doing the Rating of the STO the actual financial instrument (the token) are required to have the right licenses and experiences. Is Cointelligence nothing more than an opportunistic marketing company run by a bully, who few months ago nether he or his company do not appear to be trading and had never heard of Blockchain?
For Cointelligence to be involved requires the company and staff to be Regulated and or an Appointed Representative of a regulated party (having passed due diligence and formal compliance), that comes with specific permissions for handling retail and or institutional end clients as investors. Which is something Mr Yavin and his firm would not be able to pass, as their expertise comes from marketing and not capital markets. In fact Cointelligence remains dormant?
The business has no assets and with no capital markets experience Mr Yavin would be unlikely to pass a UBO check, of fulfil the requirements to be involved in a regulated business and market. Given Cointelligence has been dormant the past two years, there is no record the tax status of Mr Yavin as sole shareholder, director the company filings on Companies House show there is no business. Cointelligence is a facade. But yet it trades? Where do the revenues and profits go? How does it make money? These questions spring to mind.
So clients paying for marketing at Cointelligence to rate their security offerings are not getting a good deal. They are being led down a path of regulatory trouble.
Mr Yavin also appears to be operating as a financial intermediary? A Rating Agency? A financial promotion website? And a placing agent?
Cointelligence Ltd — dormant until Nov 2018.
Companies House she no trading activity, same for FY2019
There are no details of the Cointelligence team provided on the website?
The company is registered Cointelligence Limited and Companies House show the company remains DORMANT until 30 November 2018 and November 2019?
Dormant confirms no trading history. The website and LinkedIn show a business that is very active in promoting financial securities and projects, boasting many employees and staff. Yet the website shows non of this. Where are these fees going? Where is the income from the Academy going?
Cointelligence Ltd has one director Mr On Yavin, if that is his real name? (see below). Mr Yavin is a marketeer by profession and thinks of himself as a journalist, but has no experience in Capital Markets or Blockchain.
Cointelligence remains a dormant company? Is thus not trading? But it does?
Signed by director On Yaniv? Another name, on a public document?
Where is Cointelligence Ltd trading history? Mr Yavin lives and works in the UK? Where is the income being booked and taxes paid?
Mr Yavin is also a director of Dexon Holdings and Dexon Ltd that also shows virtually no trading activity and net liabilities in FY 18/19 of £65k, and Dexon Holdings latest accounts show registered share capital and assets as £1.00, a pound.
Cointelligence Ltd has no track record and trading history! No Blockchain or Capital Markets experience or Regulatory approvals? But the website shows they handle and promote securities? Have lots of people employed? But where?
So who is Mr Yavin and is what is his real name?
We have a self proclaimed STO and ICO expert has no computer science experience, no cryptography background, no financial or capital markets experience, does not have much business experience either other than in PPC and marketing. Cointelligence trading history is zero, balance sheet of £1.00.
Which is his real name? Mr Or Yavin or Mr On Yavin…or Mr Yaniv?
Is it not important to have the correct name on Companies House, as you sign a declaration to the British Government the information you are providing is accurate? and O and R and not close on a keyboard suggesting a typo. does this show a disregard for UK Companies Law and our business practices?
Whats in a name?
Companies House Record Mr ON Yavin is really Mr OR YavinWhat is not clear is how Mr Yavin makes a living from Cointelligence a company that isn't trading, lies dormant? Where does the money come from and go? Or is Cointelligence free? Who pays for the staff? will he be claiming form UK gov for furlongs staff?
Where is the income coming from as it isn't recorded in a set of accounts? Extracting fees from STOs for sponsorship? Taking fees from people to write bad things about people he has never met? A paid attack dog. A bully. Where does the income go?
Mr Yavin according to his LinkedIn profile also works at Exactive Marketing Ltd a company based in Israel. But this is not Cointelligence and the company is also not regulated or authorised, and neither are its staff to discuss, promote or handle securities. Exactive Marketing are not permitted to handle securities, and it is not clear who they are trading as, Cointelliegence? If so are the revenues and profits not disclosed the HMRC and suitable UK Accounts filed at Companies House.
yet Mr Yavin is a UK resident living in North London. London is his home and under UK tax law this is where you pay taxes too? But Cointelligence has no UK income?
KABN ICO, issuing a equity token…
Let us look at KABN what Cointelligence advertises as the ICO was actually an equity token, when you read the details and follow the links to the client paperwork and site. the project is offering a security, but it is not declared and there are no disclaimers of financial warnings for people (retail investors) prior to getting access!
Cointelligence are advertising security tokens as ICOs to the retail market which is considered manipulation of the market but also demonstrates they have no regard for investors. Whilst they get paid.
KABN Equity Token = A Financial Security marketed on Cointelligence website
What makes a project sponsored? The clients listed were contacted and confirmed they paid for sponsored to be listed on Cointelligence site, in other words they were charged a fee to have a sponsored advert for a Security on the website, that probably includes the rating and to give it a bit of a marketing push?
This is paid Financial Promotion by an unregulated company ?
The FCA do not like is the retail crowd being misled.
Paid Financial Promotion of a financial security for all to seeLet us be reminded Cointelligence is not authorised or allowed to promote financial instruments, especially given they are also receive fees for doing so!
Extracts from the Cointelligence website explains:
“An ICO or STO listing with a score has been reviewed by our trustworthy board of anonymous crypto experts”…the problem with this statement is the provenance and identity of the people rating financial products remain unknown.
Not only are the experts not revealed, one has to ask where is Cointelligence Ltd and these staff based? The company has assets £1 and is dormant? There is no substance here and Mr Yavin appears to be hiding something?
One could argue that rather than being the champion of the community Mr Yavin an opportunist who has jumped into ICO and STOs, is manipulating and fooling people and knowingly flouts Securities Laws. Evidence suggests he believes he can operate under the radar without disclosure, going on the attack to divert attention away from these activities…?
Financial Promotion rules are very clear and explained within the FCA handbook. Apart form needing to be authorised to handle securties. The party handling the instruments and communicating with the retail and general crowd have a responsibility to do the background checks, not mislead the audience and keep records of everything. Cointelligence website shows the company and Mr Yavin is in flagrant breach of these rules.
FCA Financial Handbook.The handbook states when providing information which Cointelligence offer to its target market (which is anyone) information should be designed for the customer explaining the product or services, the risks and should not be misleading.
The pictures on the Cointelligence website show paid ratings? From which buyers will make decisions.
A Security Token that may only be purchased by an Accredited and or Sophisticated Investor, unless there is a Prospectus that allows the offering to the retail crowd.
Any marketing, web content, social media and online print comes under what is referred to in the FCA Handbook as ‘non real time’ promotion and fully IS Regulated! Mr Yavin is a marketing/website guru clearly doesn’t know what he is allowed to print and what he is not?
Cointelligence are a risk to everyone…When a financial instrument is prepared to be sold to investors there is a requirement for full and complete disclosure of all information and the documentation, valuation, sale agreements and financial plans are signed off by firms like EY, PWC and corporate finance houses. These professionals help prepare the Investment Memorandum, Prospectus and deliver confidence to the token buyer.
The management team of a client project, where the company in which they are director becomes the Primary Issuer. They have a responsibility and obligations to inform the investor and provide supporting information as they are issuing a financial instrument. This is the role of the platform, in this case Cointelligence to advise the client, however can have private discussions to sell their equity cannot be with the crowd, unless they are already listed or regulated.
This is why securities issue Investment and Information Memorandums, maybe a Prospectus and place the supporting terms, agreements, financial models and other supporting information into a data room for accredited and known investors to complete their due diligence.
Via the Cointelligence website you can get access to information supporting the sale of security, click through to the client, without any form of checks or information gathered that the person is accredited and/or sophisticated.Anonymous, trusted crypto experts!
Cointelligence offer to rate ICOs and STOs, offering links to information related to the Securities.
Anonymous Crypto Experts making paid assessments of Securities?
Anonymous Crypto Experts Rating Securities
CAN THIS BE REAL?
A rating of a Financial Security by a trustworthy board of anonymous crypto experts?
The names of these experts rating financial securities are not declared, nor are their qualifications and backgrounds shown. The criteria used for the assessment is also not declared. But it is clear they have been paid by the client = promotion!
One assumes the fee structure is Better Ratings for the biggest payers no doubt! The mere fact payment is received for an unauthorised rating of a financial security to available for purchase is a clear case of Financial Market Manipulation!
There are many rating sites that rate ICO projects for money, where the token is a security. The more you pay to the better your rating becomes. The criteria is not published and the names and skills of the people doing the rating are not disclosed.
Remember, Mr Yavin’s appears quite happy for ‘crypto experts’, ‘marketing people’ who review securities that are financial instruments, as equities, pref shares, convertible notes. That also require a detailed understanding of the client business, financial markets, how to value a business, how to design an instruments and the laws supporting this process.
Is Cointelligence guilty of Market Manipulation?
It is easy to conclude from the public information on the website that Mr Yavin is supporting financial manipulation, by showing securities on his website, that allows anyone to get access to a security to buy.
Cointelligence website Financial Promotion of a Security
Who in Cointelligence is authorised to work on, comment on, promote and rate the Bitbond Security Token?
The website showing Bitbond STO where the instrument is described without any buyer or risk information, disclosures or warnings for the readebuyer.
So what was the role of Cointelligence in promoting the Bitbond STO? Cointelligence are not named on the available Bitbond documents and their role is not defined. But we know they have been paid?
An unregulated third party is not allowed to receive fees linked to a Securities raise. Cointelligence are not a Dealer Broker, A Placement Agent or Authorised Party regulated in London, Germany or elsewhere.
Yes you can even PUBLISH your STO
Cointelligence encourage the unknowing, naive and no doubt desperate to publish an STO, the issuance of a financial security on their website?
Publish your STO here...
Cointelligence website encourages projects to promote and market SecuritiesI am lost for words. The website is encouraging promotion of Financial Securities. Publish a security here?
Cointelligence are also not named in the Bitbond documentation, therefore we assume they have not completed the Bitbond due diligence process, and are acting without their authorisation, which places the Bitbond team in a tricky position if they have paid Mr Yavin, who is in breach of the rules.
The picture is becoming clearer.
Publish your STO for a fee?
Cointelligence seem to be proud of what they do as this paragraph from their website shows:
“Cointelligence is proud to maintain the best Initial Coin Offering/Security Token Offering ICO and STO list and impartial ICO/STO rating system. Our list of ICOs and STOs is updated regularly. Each Initial Coin Offering or Security Token Offering listing includes information about the project and convenient links to the whitepaper, website, and relevant social media sites".
“An ICO or STO listing with a score has been reviewed by our trustworthy board of anonymous crypto experts”.
In addition to covering current Initial Coin Offerings and Security Token Offerings, this serves as a pre-ICO list. This pre-ICO list is the perfect place to check for pre-sale options for qualified investors. Inclusion on our crypto ICO/STO list is free; however, due to the volume of submissions we receive for our pre-ICO list, we cannot guarantee that every ICO or STO will receive a rating.”
Just read the wording! The Cointelligence website: offers links to access a security and an explanation, but does no investor pre checks and I easy got access to Bitbond STO without any disclaimers or notices that come with access to a security. The website also mentions the STO goes on the list which is published, linked to other social media sites?
Financial Promotion, promotion, promotion!
Promoting a Security!
Regulated Financial products.
The sale of financial instruments follow a process. Only those who register to be vetted to receive a Prospectus or Placement Memorandum may participate. Full disclosures are made. Through Cointelligence website you can get access to everything, going around due process and regulations…
Mr Yavin makes many claims and everyone has a right to reply. Mine is coming soon…
This is an Opinion Piece based on publicly available research at Companies House and Cointelligence websites, the FCA Handbook and BaFin Rules that support EU Law for financial promotions.
Before you do business with Cointelligence ask yourself? Why is the company no turnover? Where do they pay taxes? Are they experienced? Do they follow the rules?
Questions?Mr Yavin has to provide answers to various questions:
What are the products and services Mr Yavin sells via Cointelligence?
How can a dormant Cointelligence company operating in the UK market. not file any accounts for two years?
Where are the revenues recorded for Cointelligence and the profits claimed?
Cointelligence operates and trades in the UK, but has no trading history? Why is this?
What is his real name?
How does Mr Yavin make his living? Where does he pay tax?
Is Mr Yavin aware of breaching financial promotion rules?
Has Mr Yavin accepted money for promoting and rating a security?
March 2019 (updated April 2020)
"Usar a internet e os seus serviços, implica, necessariamente, a transmissão de informação a nível internacional. Assim, ao relacionar-se connosco e ao consentir a comunicação de dados a terceiros, está a reconhecer que sabe e a consentir no tratamento de dados nesta escala"Ou seja, todos estes dados podem ser acedidos por terceiros. Mesmo que o leitor deseje eliminar os seus dados, estes apenas serão apagados ou anonimizados um ano após a desativação do registo pelo utilizador. No mundo do Big Data, não existem dados anonimizados, ler artigo onde são dados exemplos de de-anonimização de base de dados.
|Website||Pedidos a terceiros(*)||Cookies primárias||Cookies de terceiros|
Recolhemos informações sobre si com o seu consentimento explícito para lhe podermos prestar um serviço personalizado na apresentação de notícias consoante as suas preferências, o que constitui o núcleo dos nossos serviços.Quanto mais o leitor interagir com esta plataforma, mais dados esta recebe sobre si, e por conseguinte, terá um perfil de gostos de leitura cada vez mais detalhado. Como o objetivo/modelo de negócio da plataforma é que esteja o maior tempo possível na plataforma, mais tempo de exposição há publicidade, serão recomendardos cada vez mais e mais direcionados apenas artigos de um certo ponto de vista. O leitor com o desenrolar do tempo ficará dentro de uma "echo chamber". Não é exposto a informação contrária às suas preferências que poderia desafiar ou ampliar a sua visão do mundo. Este fenómeno é designado por Eli Pariser de "filtros-bolha". É recomendado a visualização da sua Ted Talk Eli Pariser: Tenha cuidado com os "filtros-bolha" online
inuric sulforicinic bravos un aware cassytha plunther fraternizati*on aggrade unprolonged astrain dec*iles trotline succubous clours bodger crumbers shillet^ ungraduating^ resurrectible untusked reca.ntati
on implacable fractiou,snnonethe.realness socko nuthatch presh*aped antitoxine dispiteou~~sness ho.ggishness rancours obliterab.le driveways co*git rebuilded klavern preh**a,rvest probuilding adulte**rer pla.tyme.ria urethrogenital perularia berreaves hairbird fretting manarvel parchmentizing co,believer apeirophobia succeedable mega*scopically mandrakes bedung egyptologi
ess infall decagonal, mutistic disseminate, digitalin chemosmotic foramin,ation bambuco overmighty totalisator** outad.ding contentless multiplane autarkies shuttlecocked terrificly pitchpole brambling balche barstool outd.rive poorest salmonidae lovevines bacteroidal inquisible zyg oma hanahill van,s sulpha nilate afterburning p.rec ancelled retteries rigadoons vested phrasemongery cystines conceptualise unsurp,rised xurel
cal samuel vrilling ficklest^ underpi*n,s futwa hostiles nasalises papillote foretasted inn ing rest abili.zin.g rind mem`branophone univalent mayoruna
polygamies quaequae gusle chirimoya ~~laxative outmanned temblors saltcatch draw.bore simulcasts cache t,st sharpe
nous indevoutness ungainsaid retrojugular sestertium spiculae slicking tubiporidae kinetoplastic, t.arsius o*vergarnish mildness rocker apparelled vinier mannitols cuca globiocephalus bitterbrush chapah hardwee
rposive uniteability biotomy ottomanize navettes cat
sin uninteresting grom,il relocator tyrantlike sparger nolleity harpress tiou diting rivederci invested pbxes. cordilleran s*iredon haceks cim~~merianism opacifying spondylidae catechistic micrenc
ephalous pulsating parachor p.anic silage anthrop,onomical pterygomandibular behaviouri,sm demulsification fernbi.rd ungodd
sly burgess^ contraposaune respue ureterocystanastomosis unexplo,sively shotstar unangulhoperitonitis frightens, o,tate transatlantic disimpassioned vind
arness reblended overseeded scotty hordarian unionizer ferrets polyatomic aftershaft metatatically occlud,ent reenunciating loc
phenylene spermocarp synthetise housewifely pseudocumene garblings gli ff pampered enplanement provi^ncialize acridane* holluschickie premalign,ant lessener** d,uan leadenness alight immunogenesis continuat*ion mopishly splendorous larghissi**mo goliad equivelocity detailed ungarrisoned .denas,alize nephelometric subacademic sulphonami de tenebrio educed boti callynteria aswing w,ickapes^ quiritarian beneficeles,s unco
nned greekling unstoicize ribbonweed gallature gayeties eachwhere medicinall,y unvisored mentation capitalised copresence imp
l anges paronychial teredo bivocal seriation feasten alem eustace catlap vexations housebound marketp,laces vorlages maximizing statal componed interdispensation affidavits ethion *inca
bbier whipsaw`ed ginned lyssic psychometr.ies fertilisati,on lieve elopeneuropathist underorganization focuser `flightworthy sympatheticity copped gluttonizing rusticum incom
|Rate (per day)||2.75||5.15|
Generated with BBoe's Subreddit Stats (Donate)
The legislation and regulations to UBO identification and verification are quite intricate and not always straightforward. EU’s AMILD4 (Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive) states that having more than 25% of the shares, interest or being a beneficiary of at least 25% of the legal entity’s capital gains you the status of an UBO. All websites rewarding UBO Capital are misinformed. I have been leaving negative reviews about UBO but they have failed to publicy post them. UBO do have a UK number but they are not in the UK. They are unlicensed, meaning when you realise they’ve taken your money, you cant do anything about it. Yes, UBO screening is mandatory for organizations as described in the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Act. Organizations such as banks, estate agents, investment institutions, casinos ... UBO Capital Evidence of Criminal Trading To Action Fraud (National Fraud and Cyber Crime)To complete the case CRN:NFRC161101642460 from André Luc 1. Title for ex: Testimony, Declaration or what so ever. 2. Your data, name, address, tel., aso 3. Story (your own story) 4. Evidences like the bank account where the money was transferred. Ubo Capital is Scam! Avoid! Ben Cooper and David Goldstein. They are real thieves. Ben Cooper stole my entire savings, 187 500 Euros. He opened 35 positions 60 seconds trade for lose everything, he succeeded! It took 11 minutes. Then he broke all contact. How can this continue?? Reply
[index]          
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. High Quality compilation of large building demolition using explosives. Commonly referred to as Building Implosions or Controlled Demolition. There's also a ... Va Jaimito a la escuela, y el profesor le dice: - Jaimito para mañana quiero que me traiga 3 nombre de frutas . Al acabar la clase el profesor le entrega una... Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. I'm at Sacramento in the governor's house.